Girl Talk: Through the glossy looking glass

Girl Talk: Through the glossy looking glass (everyone is impossibly thin and fabulous!)

While we're still getting our heads around the spring/summer collections celebrated in the glossies on stands now (produced three months ago), the fash pack has its attention focused on New York for Mercedes-Benz Fashion Week's fall collections (see Clare Press' "Chictionary" explanation of the crazy fashion cycle... no wonder caffeine and dark glasses are a f'row necessity).

In light of Fashion Week, the CFDA (Council of Fashion Designers America) held a discussion about body image entitled "The Beauty of Health: Resizing the Sample Size" (as reported by Sally Holmes for The Cut). On the panel were casting agent James Scully, model Doutzen Kroes and designer Zac Posen.

Scully talked of the unhealthy practises used by models wanting to stay in the business: a business that currently demands them to be skinny. Very skinny. Like Vogue Australia covergirl and current catwalk favourite Abbey Lee Kershaw, 22, who has lost a lot of weight since I cast her in a beauty shoot in 2006.

Kershaw talked to Today Tonight this week (see the clip at Frockwriter) about what it takes to stay at the top of the fashion model game: "An elite performer is always put under some sort of extreme pressure that the rest of society can argue and not quite understand."

It's this idea, that the fashion world is quite separate from the rest of society, ensconced in a glossy bubble where everyone is impossibly thin, chic and fabulous, and where different rules apply, that prompted Harper's BAZAAR Australia editor Edwina McCann to explain in her March editor's letter:

"There's always debate about the role the fashion industry plays in shaping young women's minds and, most importantly, their opinions of themselves. Mostly, the judgments are negative, with fashion image makers and creators blamed for, well, just about everything. I don't want to make light of this subject, especially with regard to body image, but it strikes me how foreign this perception of fashion in the media is, for me anyway. It's just not the way I see my world... When it comes to fashion I find it impossible to remove my lovely (transparent Prada) rose-tinted glasses. From where I am sitting, I see plenty to admire."*

In my recent piece for Body + Soul, The Body Image Trap, I alluded to the concept of glossy conditioning: i.e. how editors filter the images they feature in their magazines through the accepted aesthetic Zeitgeist. If the current body image trend is towards fit and healthy supermodels, as it was in the '90s, that is what they'll feature; if it is skeletal models, that is what they'll feature. Presumably, if Karl Lagerfeld decided to use only size 10 models in his next RTW show (ha!), the glossies would follow (in Chanel) suit.

Zac Posen said of the trend towards using girls of a sub-zero physique: "I think we created a droid-like mold and … fashion editors or stylists or now even buyers are trained to look at that and say I can’t see continuity unless I see the same droid-like skeleton on the runway." It's no coincidence that the fashion folk you see in pictures on sites like Jak & Jil are also very thin.

Fashion magazines are not interested in normal or average: they are about aspiration, whether it's achieving your first Prada purse purchase or the figure of a fourteen-year-old Estonian model (how that got to be "aspirational" in the first place is a whole other post). They are "fantasy", "art", "escapism", "not real". And if you can't appreciate that, don't buy them... or at least stop bitching about them.

But, the thing is, like it or not, they have influence. In the absence of faith, and want for inclusion, many women worship at the altar of fashion and live by the Vogue bible, where skinny is equated with power and success and the path to contentment looks a lot like the Champs Elysées. If Katie Grand or Anna Wintour or Kate Moss or Miuccia Prada make a statement, it echoes. Because, rightly or wrongly, society has deemed that they are special people with special trend-setting powers.

Prolific pop-sociologist Rachel Hills recently asked on her blog, if fashion, "specifically the kind of fashion you come across in women’s magazines, the kind of fashion embodied by edgy ‘It’ girls", is just for skinny girls. It would seem so. This unfortunate "us" versus "them" dichotomy (eloquently described by Lisa Hilton as "Bambi-limbed aspirations of the catwalk and our own wretched, cellulite-smothered carcasses") in the world of glossy fashion publishing makes for a lot of bitterness amongst women.

Like the perfect "Plastics" group of your high-school year, fashion magazines are exclusive and exclusionary: the domain of the exceptionally pretty and well dressed and wealthy. Not everyone belongs. And if you do manage to enter the fashion world on the basis of your creative talent, you will be encouraged to transform your physical self into a slimmer version (see: Rodarte sisters, Lily Allen, Karl Lagerfeld...) to maintain your membership. Call it fat fascism. And once you have tasted the validation that weight-loss can bring you, or start looking at the world through the glossy looking glass, you will become an evangelist yourself.

This thinner-is-better mentality leads to critiques of "round" celebrities, like that now-infamous New York Times blog written by Andy Port (and critiqued here by Hurricane Vanessa), and the insinuation that the beautiful AND busty Christina Hendricks is too big for fashion (clearly, ridiculous - but the glossy looking glass has a tendency to warp your thinking). It also leads to women going on soul-sucking diets that rob them of enjoyment and a general and pervasive discontentment. Because, as the Duchess of Windsor Wallis Simpson once said, you can never be too rich or too thin – a motto fashion magazines have taken on with gusto.

Of course, richness and thinness, as we all know, is not equated with happiness or contentment, which seems to allude the fashion world at large (hence, let's quickly move onto the next season so we don't have to stop too long to think about it). Stories of female discontent pervade the fashion glossies, just as they consume Lily Allen's social media updates. When will this vicious cycle stop? Perhaps when someone in the upper echelons of the fashion tribe comes to their senses.

"There's ideals that are so ingrained in our culture," said Posen. "Kate Moss was young and cute and hot, and underaged and modeling, and great. And that created a sensation. And that's going to be ingrained in our culture for a long time. So it is gonna be something there that people in fashion are going to be drawn to."

Kate Holden recently wrote of her conversion to the yoga set for The Age, concluding, "If only appearing fantastic weren't based on such a fantasy." Ah, fantasy – by definition "an imagined or conjured up sequence fulfilling a psychological need". At what point does fantasy become dangerous? Like video games that send gun-toting teenagers into schools, put a fashion mag in the hands of an impressionable young lady with a predisposition for eating disorder, perfectionism and/or low self-esteem and watch her mind become distorted. Hello, didn't Katie Grand have anorexia? It's no secret glossy over-exposure helped kick things along for me.

Helpfully, Doutzen Kroes – a top model (who ironically looks like Barbie) with a refreshing point of view (and a bottom) – added to the CFDA discussion: "When you don’t eat, you get grumpy, you don’t feel good. So how can you have joy in what you’re doing? And I have that joy and I think that’s what clients see and that’s why I work for two huge global brands. They like working with me, and it’s because I’m eating! There are naturally skinny girls, but not all of them and I’m not one of them."

Self-acceptance, joy and success? From where I'm sitting, that's something to admire. That's what special people are made of.

"The LORD does not look at the things man looks at. Man looks at the outward appearance, but the LORD looks at the heart." 1 Samuel 16: 7

*To be fair to McCann, she lists covergirl Kate Hudson as a "confident woman having fun with fashion", Isabel Lucas as "a young, passionate woman on a mission to save Australia's Coral Sea", Scarlett Johansson as "determined to use her fame to improve Third World HIV medical care" and creative Australians working in fashion, including US Harper's BAZAAR's Laura Brown, fashion director Jillian Davison and stylist/designer Michelle Jank. Still, it's a small fashion pool.

Pic credit: InStyle.com (Karl, Lily, Kate)

See also: "I probably fit the sample size once – when I was 11" @ Jezebel.com

Yours truly,
Girl With a Satchel

9 comments:

Anonymous said...

my favourite GWAS post. ever.

I think every point hit the nail on the head.
I adore fashion magazines, and have the idea imprinted that skinny is incredible.
But I know I am never going to achieve the waif model look. It sucks, and I do look at models and the fash pack with envy and awe. artistically they are beautiful (something my boyfriend does NOT understand my attraction to).
and my looks and body did honestly stop me from pursuing a career in the industry because i knew i would always feel inferior.

I'm fine with that, i love my career now, I'm getting there with my looks and my body, and fashion magazines still transport me into a stunning world where everything is perfect.

Erica, once again, your blog made my day xx

Mish said...

[Fashion magazines are not interested in normal or average: they are about aspiration, whether it's achieving your first Prada purse purchase or the figure of a fourteen-year-old Estonian model. They are "fantasy", "art", "escapism", "not real". And if you can't appreciate that, don't buy them... or at least stop bitching about them.]

AMEN. A-FRAKKIN'-MEN.

This is my gripe with the media implosion over the marieclaire/Hawkins thing last month. Real people in magazines do not sell magazines, nor do they help fund the production and existence of them.

The whole business of magazines and the everyday person is a cycle that sustains itself - it takes two to tango (consumer + magazine). But let's face it - we're only human. It's much easier to bitch and blame something else for our own insecurities than take responsibility for them ourselves.

Thank you for writing this post, Erica - you really do continue to inspire =)
xx

Rachel @ Musings of an Inappropriate Woman said...

Hey Erica, great post - and thanks for the shout out.

One of the commenters on my blog post rightly pointed out that it's not just a skinny physique that makes a fashion 'It' girl - it's a reflection of your personality and attitude as well. I still maintain though that many of the "fashion icon" celebs I encounter in my work are more renowned for their supermodel like proportions than for what they actually wear, though.

As an aside, I've seen those Golden Globes pics (of Aniston, Hudson and Cox) on Getty and I'm almost certain they were altered to make the celebs look wider than they actually are (for the article you referenced - not on Getty). Jennifer Aniston in particular looks nothing like that. I haven't looked at as many Globes pics of Hudson or Cox, but I wouldn't be surprised if they were altered too.

Nat Webster said...

I was going to single out the same quote as Mish so perhaps we are all on the same wavelength. I know that fashion magazines are not 'real' but I'm also older and wiser enough to understand why. I agree that some magazines in the hands of the wrong 12-18 year old could be devastating. Having said that, there are plenty of magazines working to improve the self esteem of young women where parents and peers are perhaps failing.

Great blog post Erica. Food for thought (pardon the pun).

Anonymous said...

Great post Erica. The one thing I am going to add about the extreme skinniness obsession in the fashion industry is the personal example of Natasha Poly. A beautiful Russian model whose career I have followed for a number of years now. When she started in the modeling industry she was naturally thin of course but at least looked healthy. Now when I see photos of her I feel so sad. She is extremely skinny to the point of anorexia. I really hope the fashion industry start to do something about this obsession with skinniness before someone like the beautiful Natasha Poly dies due to her condition (I know I am being dramatic but her photos are shocking - look in Australian Vogue). Does she have anyone around her helping her? She should not be in this condition and working. The sad thing is that it is FASHION that these sad women are dying for - so superficial and a waste.

SachaStrebe said...

so much of my world is consumed by fashion magazines, and I will happily continue to consume because I just love fashion... but in saying that, as much as I try not to let their `thin is in' and flawless skin faced models get to me, I guess there will always be an element of doubt about myself that will creep in to my consciousness after seeing these unrealistic images... my husband is convinced that my magazine reading changes the way I look and feel about myself...I always deny it, but secretly I know that he's right... I am old enough now to know better as you mentioned and NAT webster did also, but as a young girl I too had issues with eating and can imagine how it would effect a 12-year-old now... interesting post as always Erica, always on to the issues that no-one dares touch! nice work...

Unknown said...

This was an awesome article and I couldn't have agreed more. It is sad to say but as much as I don't want to be influenced, I find myself being sucked into the mindset that skinnier is prettier. Seeing the negative results from this influence makes me wonder what the next trend will be and if it will be even worse than the current situation.

Unknown said...

This was an awesome article and I couldn't have agreed more. It is sad to say but as much as I don't want to be influenced, I find myself being sucked into the mindset that skinnier is prettier. Seeing the negative results from this influence makes me wonder what the next trend will be and if it will be even worse than the current situation.

Unknown said...

This was an awesome article and I couldn't have agreed more. It is sad to say but as much as I don't want to be influenced, I find myself being sucked into the mindset that skinnier is prettier. Seeing the negative results from this influence makes me wonder what the next trend will be and if it will be even worse than the current situation.