If you're feeling rather Teletubby-like after a week or two of festive over-indulgence, or, at the opposite end of the mental scale, regularly entertain anorexic-type thoughts, be warned: Grazia has a severe case of body dysmorphia.Trumpeting Nicole Richie's rise above the "curse" of size zero, the mag is excited to report the former fatty-come-anorexic is now a healthy (and "curvy") 50kgs, thanks to baby Harlow and supportive hubby Joel:
"Glowing with health, the 27-year-old was happy to show off her curvy body as she kayaked... while on holiday in Hawaii."
Grazia gets a 'friend' of Nicole's to conveniently say what they're thinking (like a fun game of 'This Is Your Life', according to Grazia): "Nicole is right on target now at 50kg. She's the healthiest she's been in her whole life and it's all down to Joel's positive influence and rules..."
When she was "considerably curvier" circa 2004, Grazia tells us the 164cm celebrity mum
weighed in at a whopping 63kg. But now, according to Grazia's inside sources, she's stopped skipping meals and eats six times a day. The 'friend' ads that Nicole has been taking cooking classes, while she's also taken to thrice-weekly Kundalini yoga classes and long walks.I'm all for Richie's positive body transformation (having experienced a year in the life of her body morphed with Madonna's, I can tell you thin ain't all fashionable fun and glamorous games) but do wonder whether it's helpful for a glossy to champion 50kgs on a 164cm frame as a body ideal for young women to aspire to (my dietician would think not – 50kgs being at the low end of the BMI scale).
But perhaps more unhelpful is the breakout that accompanies the story, 'The ever expanding thin list', which shows us pictures of Lindsay Lohan, Lara Flynn Boyle, Rachel Zoe, Shenae Grimes, Jessica Stroup, Taylor Momsen and Allegra Versace at their
thinnest, which, though perhaps unintentionally, reinforces the glamour of thin (five of the girls are in red-carpet frocks).Flick over a couple of pages, and Grazia's thin celebrity obsession continues with Victoria Beckham and her rib cage ('Too Posh for Pudding' - okay, clever headline), then we get saggy old Donatella Versace in a bikini, and page after page of stick-thin model in the fashion pages (who are, apparently, "the beautiful faces set to define the next year of fashion").
Then, to further enhance your New Year slim-is-in mindset, there's 'The Great Diet Cheat Sheet', which helpfully gives us a rundown of the latest and greatest diet regimes (only diet every other day; have five different tastes in every meal; keep treats to 100 calories; use the carb ladder; learn the five-minute breakfast; master a six-minute workout; rationalise your cravings).
Thankfully, columnist Matthew Evans is on hand to remind us that food consumption can be a pleasurable activity more about taste, variety and getting one's fill than self-flagellating, restrictive regimes.
On an even more positive note, the glossy weekly seems to have hit its catwalk stride with its
first issue for 2009. Nothing too 'old news' and lots of fashion inspiration. It's also fairly ad (calorie) free, making it good value for your five bucks (in relative terms, of course – it only costs $1.40 a day to feed a World Vision child, after all – oh, the irony).THE GLOSSARY
The good bits: Edwina McCann's column on humiliating maxi dress moments; Sarah Reid on Elle Macpherson's shameless self-promotion (a bit of an editorial backflip for Grazia, which usually praises Macpherson and her like); Alpha Delta, four pages devoted to the lovely 24-year-old diva; The Big Red Roadtest (Maxine Frith in a pair of Louboutins); Are You Smarter Than a Fashionista (feel fashion-smart and take the quiz!); Melissa Hoyer on Tim Gunn; Lucinda Pitt on ghd beauty crimes; Matthew Evans 'Out of the pantry!'; take a trip to Zanzibar and Bali; Grazia's New York and London columns; FHM editor Ben Smithurst's week of 'yes'; and the 411 on Rosario Dawson.
Blink and skip it: How Nicole Got Her Groove Back; Too Posh for Pudding; the vacuous star sign special; skinny models in fashion pages; the 'Hangover Heaven' accessories shoot
(seriously, hangovers as glamorous?); The Great Diet Cheat Sheet (I know you'll read it anyway).Pretty pages: 'Style Dash', 'A Model Wardrobe' (Aussie model special), Delta Goodrem.
Glossy posse: Chloe Sevigny, Chelsey Davy, Delta Goodrem, J.Lo, Gabriella Cilmi, Katie Holmes, The Veronicas, Elle Macpherson, Paris Hilton, Madonna, Agyness Deyn...
Glossy stats: Issue 24 (Jan 12, 2009); $5; 108 pages
Glossy bosses: Alison Veness-McGourty; ACP Magazines
Glossy ads: Just Cavalli, Hilfiger, ghd, Harper's Bazaar...
Glossy rating: 2
Yours truly,
Girl With a Satchel
P.S. GWAS' new (simpler) glossy rating structure can be seen in the sidebar, but I've also posted it below for you. If you have any suggestions about how to make the mag reviews more appealing, be my guest (please play nice!).
GWAS GLOSSY RATING
A glossy magazine worth spending your pocket money on?
1 - No... for the sake of your brain cells. Borrow a book instead.
2 - Perhaps not... preserve your self-esteem; buy a sweet treat.
3 - Possibly... worth a flick but not your lunch money.
4 - Yes... skim at your leisure then lend to a friend.
5 - Definitely... consider it a secure glossy investment.





























































9 comments:
love the new rating system!
New rating system is brilliant.
Erica, this may be prying slightly, but you've hinted quite a bit of late at your weight problems. Are we going to be reading more about this anytime soon? Just wondering if it is connected to magazine/body issues etc. and would love to hear you weigh in on if you think mags can cause eating disorders?
Hi anon,
Thanks for your comment. I've been filtering in the odd personal comment about my weight struggles, as I think 'going public' (though not blatantly) will somewhat aid in my recovery; I also don't want to be hypocritical in any way.
I'm living evidence that while glossy mags can't be blamed for eating disorders (I believe you have to have a genetic predisposition, while other environmental factors also play their part), that their consumption can certainly warp your thinking. More particularly, overexposure to celebrity images, dieting stories and the like is not healthy. To read as many women's/celebrity magazines as I do and not be affected would take self-esteem of steel! I've suffered from the glossy/bloggy version of Gold War Syndrome. Thankfully, I have friends, family and medical support to help nurture me to wellness... unlike some of the poor girls/women out there (and I'm thinking the likes of Rachel Zoe and all those emaciated models).
As I make major headway, I'll probably feel better equipped to blog more on the topic.
Gosh, I feel so exposed (double eek!)! But clever you for picking up on it and posing the question.
Cheers,
Erica
Thanks for your honestly, Erica, and good luck with getting better.
Just wanted to say that the new rating system is fab, and much easier to understand. :)
Hi Erica, the new review layout is great! Shorter and concise, and I like having one rating system as I used to get the other ones confused!
The new review system is great...descriptive.
I found the first copy of Grazia I bought, while I was cleaning up papers (and looking for a contract), and I thought I picked up two mags instead of one, but no...I checked the pages, and Issue 1, with Kate Moss on the cover, has 170 pages.
Looks like they're slimming down the magazine. I didn't notice it until today.
Hi Erica,
The new rating system's great. It gives you a much better idea of what's inside each mag, so I know which ones to skip next time I'm at Borders!
Best wishes on your recovery. "Going public" is really tough -even though about 3 people read my LJ, I've just started talking about my weight/psych issues and my "body positive" resolutions/steps -and every time I post on it, I expect some nasty anonymous comment.
Speaking of future posts on this topic, I've got a less "personal" angle that might interst you.
I don't know how feasible this is (in terms of industry contacts, etc), but it'd be interesting to read about how the whole celebrity weight thing specifically affects women working in the glossy world. Is there more pressure to be super-skinny (to be the "perfect magazine girl," embodying the image you're selling), or less (since you'd know firsthand how artificial and false these images are)?
Hi Cara Mia,
Thanks so much for your feedback. I'll definitely be taking your suggestion on board. There's really no doubt in my mind that existing in the 'glossy bubble' (particularly the fashion and popular womens' mags - and, indeed celeb mags) warps one's body image perceptions. That said, many girls who work in mags suffer from 'perfect girl syndrome' before they join the ranks.
Would be interested to read your LJ posts.
Cheers,
Erica
Nicole Richie isnt 164cm tall... she is 155cm! You are getting your facts wrong..check Nicole's official imdb website profile and past quotes where she has stated her height at 5'1 and 50kg for 5'1 is much healthier.
Post a Comment